Messages That Land.

Representative Massie, my name is [your name]. I don't live in your district, but I follow your stand against agencies that make law by decree — and that's exactly what's happening here. Around August 5 the DEA is using emergency powers to place 7-OH into Schedule I, skipping notice-and-comment, skipping any hearing, and by statute immune from court review, while officials in the administration hold financial stakes that gain from the ban. I'm asking you to call out this end-run around the process and demand the review Congress requires. Thank you.

Senator Paul, my name is [your name]. I don't live in Kentucky, but I respect your defense of individual liberty and your record of holding agencies accountable. The DEA is about to ban 7-OH by emergency order — no public rulemaking, no court review — and there are documented financial conflicts among officials who benefit. As chair of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, you have the standing to ask who drove this and why. Please use it. Thank you.

Senator Wyden, my name is [your name]. In 2016 you signed the letter urging the DEA to slow its rushed move to ban kratom and let science and the public weigh in — and the agency backed off. It's happening again: the DEA is emergency-scheduling 7-OH around August 5, bypassing notice-and-comment and judicial review. I'm asking you to do what you did before — demand transparency and a genuine review before this takes effect. Thank you.

Senator Booker, my name is [your name]. I admire your work to move past the failed war-on-drugs approach and put harm reduction ahead of prohibition. The DEA is about to place 7-OH into Schedule I by emergency order — the same rushed, prohibition-first move you and colleagues pushed back on in 2016. Banning it won't end demand; it will push people toward an unregulated, more dangerous market. Please speak out for review and a smarter path. Thank you.

Senator Gillibrand, my name is [your name]. In 2016 you joined the call for the DEA to slow its rushed kratom ban and weigh the public-health evidence. The agency is doing it again with 7-OH — an emergency Schedule I placement, effective on publication around August 5, with no hearing and no court review. I'm asking you to stand up again for process and for patients before this is locked in. Thank you.

Representative Pocan, my name is [your name]. You led the bipartisan House letter in 2016 that helped stop the DEA's hasty kratom ban. The agency is repeating the playbook with 7-OH — an emergency Schedule I order, no notice-and-comment, no court review, taking effect around August 5. You beat this once. I'm asking you to rally your colleagues and do it again. Thank you.

Senator Sanders, my name is [your name]. In 2016 you helped lead the Senate's push to halt the DEA's rushed move to ban kratom. It's back: the DEA is emergency-scheduling 7-OH around August 5, skipping public comment and judicial review, while officials with financial stakes stand to gain. This is exactly the kind of unchecked agency action you've long opposed. Please speak out again. Thank you.

Representative Lee, my name is [your name]. I follow your fight against big money using government to squeeze out working people — and that's exactly what's happening here. Around August 5 the DEA can place 7-OH into Schedule I by emergency order, skipping public comment and even court review, while the established sellers who lobbied for the ban stand to profit and officials with financial stakes cheer it on. You sit on the House Oversight Committee. I'm asking you to ask the obvious question — who drove this, and who gains — before a rushed order rewards the insiders. Thank you.

Representative Ocasio-Cortez, my name is [your name]. I follow your push to put harm reduction ahead of the prohibition reflex, and to ask who actually profits from a policy. The DEA is about to place 7-OH into Schedule I by emergency order around August 5 — skipping public comment and court review — while the incumbent sellers who lobbied for it stand to gain and officials with financial stakes cheer it on. You sit on Energy and Commerce, over the FDA and drug policy. I'm asking you to demand a real review and ask who drove this, before a rushed ban pushes people toward a more dangerous market. Thank you.

Mayor Wilson, my name is [your name]. I'm not a Seattle constituent, but I'm watching what you're doing — winning with regular people, then clearing out the insiders who answer to the building instead of the city. The fight I care about is bigger than any one town: whether government answers to the public or to the money. You're modeling the right answer. Keep going — and know that people well outside Seattle are paying attention and rooting for it. Thank you.

Mayor Mamdani, my name is [your name]. I'm not a New Yorker, but I'm watching what you're doing — winning without the big-money gatekeepers and governing for the many instead of the connected few. The fight I care about is bigger than any one city: whether government answers to the public or to the money. Keep proving it can be done — and know people well outside New York are paying attention. Thank you.

Ms. Kiros, my name is [your name]. I'm not in your district, but I noticed how you won — a grassroots campaign that beat a thirty-year incumbent without the big-money machine behind you. Whatever the issue, that's the independence this fight needs: leaders who answer to the people who sent them, not the donors. If you make it to Washington, I hope you carry that in with you. People well outside Colorado are watching. Thank you.

Dr. El-Sayed, my name is [your name]. I'm not in Michigan, but I watched you win a Senate primary on small-dollar donations against the big outside money — and as a physician, you know the difference between medicine and a moral panic. If you get to the Senate, you'll help write the next chapter of drug policy. I'm asking you to carry one principle in: regulate what's real, don't prohibit by decree, and always ask who profits from the ban. People well outside Michigan are watching. Thank you.

Mr. Fishback, my name is [your name]. I'm watching your run at the governor's office against your own party's hand-picked candidate — because a race where the machine already crowned the winner isn't much of a choice. Whatever our differences, I'd ask you to prove the outsider label is real: name your donors, refuse the strings, and put the people who'd vote for you ahead of the ones who'd fund you. That's the test — on the right and the left. Thank you.