The Public Record · Updated July 1, 2026
What you need to know.
01 — The Filing
On July 1, 2026, the DEA issued two Notices of Intent to begin temporary (emergency) scheduling. One targets 7-OH above a set concentration threshold — the government's own words say this is aimed at concentrated and synthetic 7-OH, allowing the trace amounts of 7-OH that occur naturally in kratom leaf products to remain outside the scheduling action. The other Notice of Intent outright schedules three lab-made derivatives — MP, MGM-15, and MGM-16 — that do not occur in the plant at all. HHS and FDA publicly commended the move the same day.
We believe enhanced kratom alkaloid products should have sensible regulations rather than an outright ban: rigorous lab testing, educational materials packaged with every product, child-proof containers, a 21-and-up purchase age, removal from gas stations and stores that don't check ID at the door, removal from stores that sell alcohol, mandatory age verification on websites, regulated and consistent product naming, and a ban on advertising these products online or otherwise — since ads for enhanced alkaloid products can reach vulnerable populations and youth.
Whole-leaf kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) contains only trace 7-OH. The filing says it is not meant to capture the botanical leaf.
High-concentration 7-OH above a threshold, plus lab-made derivatives MP, MGM-15 and MGM-16 — sold as tablets, gummies, and shots.
02 — The Record
Every entry links to a primary source. This didn't come out of nowhere — it was a year in the making.
At a joint press conference, FDA recommends scheduling 7-OH and releases a report. The Commissioner calls concentrated 7-OH a possible "fourth wave" of the opioid epidemic.
FDA sends warning letters to seven companies selling 7-OH products, dated June 25 and announced July 15. In December, FDA, DOJ and the U.S. Marshals seize roughly $1M of 7-OH product from three firms in Missouri.
Senators and House members send letters urging the DEA to move fast on emergency scheduling, repeating the "13× morphine" and "fourth wave" framing.
The emergency scheduling process officially begins. A public comment window (an OASH Request for Information on the threshold) opens alongside it.
03 — The Mechanism
Two tracks exist. The DEA chose the fast one.
Under 21 U.S.C. § 811(h), the DEA can temporarily place a substance in Schedule I to address an "imminent hazard." A notice must run at least 30 days before an order can issue, and a temporary order lasts up to two years. The slower permanent path — the full eight-factor analysis, formal notice-and-comment, and judicial review — is a separate process the agency can pursue later.
DEA publishes its intent to schedule and the grounds for it.
Published 7/1/26HHS/OASH's request-for-information docket (HHS-OASH-2026-0232) on the concentration threshold.
Open since 7/6/26Comment window closes; comments go to the Secretary for HHS for consideration by the Attorney General.
Closes 7/31/26A Schedule I order may issue some unknown amount of time after the comment window closes — this timing can't be predicted.
Timing unknown04 — The Scrutiny
This is where the story is. Not a conspiracy — a process that may not have met its own standard. Every point below is sourced.
The emergency track is meant for a genuine "imminent hazard," and past emergency actions rested on patterns of deaths, seizures, and law-enforcement data. Independent legal analysis of the 7-OH action notes a thinner record: no confirmed fatalities from 7-OH alone, about 53 poison-control calls over a three-month period, and little seizure or trafficking data — with the case leaning heavily on animal studies and receptor-binding data rather than real-world harm.
Emergency scheduling lets the DEA act without completing the eight-factor analysis, and such orders are generally not subject to judicial review.
A supportive industry group (AHPA) publicly urged FDA to release its eight-factor analysis in the name of "radical transparency." Has it been released?
05 — Your Move
It closes July 31, 2026. This is the single highest-leverage thing you can do — but not yet, and not without reading this first.
Quality beats quantity — this is not a numbers contest. In federal rulemaking, a hundred copy-pasted identical comments get bundled and counted as basically one. A single specific, personal, substantive comment on the actual question asked carries real weight. And the math that actually moves the needle is simple:
Write one meaningful comment. Then get one other person to write theirs. That's worth more than you leaving a hundred. Here's a framework that keeps a comment specific enough to count — write it in your own words, never copy-paste:
A real person, in a real place. "I'm a [job] in [state]." No form-letter openings.
Concrete and yours — what changed, over what timeframe. Specifics are what reviewers can't dismiss.
The docket is specifically about the concentration threshold. If you have data or a view on where that line should sit, say so — this is the question actually being asked.
Ask the government to show its work: the full evidence and analysis behind an emergency finding.
Comments become public record. No personal info you don't want public. Respectful and specific always outperforms angry and vague.
06 — The Playbook
The last time the DEA tried this, the public won. Here's exactly how.
On August 31, 2016, the DEA filed to place kratom's alkaloids into Schedule I — effectively banning the plant — and it did so without a public comment period. The response was fast, organized, and bipartisan. Six weeks later, the DEA blinked.
A Notice of Intent to place mitragynine and 7-OH into Schedule I — bypassing public comment.
A White House petition passed 142,000 signatures. Roughly 400 people rallied at the White House. A bipartisan letter from 51 House members — 28 Democrats, 23 Republicans — called the move "hasty" and demanded a comment period.
Citing the volume of public input, the DEA withdrew its notice and opened a formal comment period. By 2018, HHS had pulled its scheduling request entirely.
07 — The Action Stack
In order. Notice that "submit a comment" isn't step one — understanding the ask is.
The docket is scoped to the concentration threshold specifically — not a general vote on kratom. Read the framework above before you write anything.
Register for 7-HOPE Alliance's webinar on writing an effective comment, and wait until after it to submit. A wave of aligned, on-topic comments outweighs a wave of scattered ones.
Draft it in your own words using the framework above, so you're ready to file the moment coordinated guidance drops.
Walk one other person through preparing theirs too. One good comment plus one recruit beats a hundred of your own.
If you use 7-OH, get on stable footing now rather than at a deadline. See the support section below.
08 — Work Together
You don't have to build this alone. These organizations are already producing advocacy materials and collecting testimony — the highest-leverage move is to use what they publish, share it, and add your story.
Runs an action hub, a media toolkit, a "reach out to the DEA" guide, and a story collector. Share their materials and submit your testimony.
Federal and state action pages, an education hub on 7-OH, and the #WeAreAllKratom testimony drive. Add your story and amplify the campaign.
Advocacy and support organization focused on the recovery and consumer-safety side of the enhanced-alkaloid conversation. Share their materials and add your story.
09 — Take Care of Yourself
Whatever happens with the ruling, being on stable footing protects you. This is support, not a schedule.
7-OH acts on opioid receptors, and stopping suddenly can be rough. If you're physically dependent, gradual reduction with guidance from a clinician is the safer path — not a hard stop timed to a deadline.
Getting to a stable, lower baseline early means a possible supply disruption doesn't catch you off guard. Steady footing now is the goal.
A doctor or addiction-medicine provider can tailor a safe plan and discuss options. Medication-assisted approaches exist and work for many people.
10 — Together
Uncertain moments are exactly when a community proves what it's made of.
Nobody gets through this alone, and nobody has to. Check on each other. Share what you learn. Help someone file their comment, walk a friend through a plan, answer the person who's scared and doesn't know where to start. The 2016 win wasn't one hero — it was thousands of ordinary people who refused to sit quiet and moved together.
Panic scatters. Organization compounds. Don't give up, and don't go quiet — find your people, pick one thing from the action stack, and do it today. Then bring someone with you.
The Bottom Line
A filing is not a final rule. There is a comment period open now through July 31, a proven playbook, and a coalition that has beaten this before. Accuracy, coordination, and one meaningful voice after another — that's how this gets fought, not a rush to be first.